Budreau v. Lake

Supreme Court of Georgia

Budreau v. Lake

163 S.E.2d 748, 224 Ga. 640, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 879

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 24, 1968

Docket24787

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E.2d 748 (Budreau v. Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Budreau v. Lake, 163 S.E.2d 748, 224 Ga. 640, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 879 (Ga. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

This is the second appearance of this case. See Budreau v. Crawford, 222 Ga. 716 (152 SE2d 398). Plaintiff brought suit to recover certain real estate purchased by the defendant at a foreclosure sale of a security deed. The petition alleges that the security deed had been given to the defendant’s husband who had released the said real estate from its lien by a subsequent contract with the plaintiff. The trial court dismissed the petition on demurrer and the appeal is from that judgment. Held:

We have carefully reviewed the contract relied upon by the plaintiff and find that it does nothing more than defer the debt of the security deed for one year and that this period had long expired before the foreclosure proceedings were instituted. See Budreau v. Crawford, 222 Ga. 716, 721, supra, where the same contract was construed by this court to have the same meaning. Accordingly, the validity of the lien of the security deed was not impaired or released by said contract and the plaintiff, admitting otherwise a valid foreclosure of the security deed, negatives the fact that he has title to [641]*641support this action. See Glover v. Cox, 130 Ga. 476 (61 SE 12); Powell, Actions for Land (Rev. Ed.) 470, § 391.

Submitted September 10, 1968 Decided September 24, 1968 Rehearing denied October 10, 1968. Aaron Kravitch, Robert J. Duffy, for appellant. John R. Calhoun, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler, Justice.

This is the second appearance of this case. See Budreau v. Crawford, 222 Ga. 716 (152 SE2d 398). Plaintiff brought suit to recover certain real estate purchased by the defendant at a foreclosure sale of a security deed. The petition alleges that the security deed had been given to the defendant’s husband who had released the said real estate from its lien by a subsequent contract with the plaintiff. The trial court dismissed the petition on demurrer and the appeal is from that judgment. Held:

We have carefully reviewed the contract relied upon by the plaintiff and find that it does nothing more than defer the debt of the security deed for one year and that this period had long expired before the foreclosure proceedings were instituted. See Budreau v. Crawford, 222 Ga. 716, 721, supra, where the same contract was construed by this court to have the same meaning. Accordingly, the validity of the lien of the security deed was not impaired or released by said contract and the plaintiff, admitting otherwise a valid foreclosure of the security deed, negatives the fact that he has title to [641]*641support this action. See Glover v. Cox, 130 Ga. 476 (61 SE 12); Powell, Actions for Land (Rev. Ed.) 470, § 391.

Submitted September 10, 1968 Decided September 24, 1968 Rehearing denied October 10, 1968. Aaron Kravitch, Robert J. Duffy, for appellant. John R. Calhoun, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E.2d 748, 224 Ga. 640, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budreau-v-lake-ga-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack