Budnik v. Culross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Budnik v. Culross

104 A.D.2d 988, 481 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20420

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 988 (Budnik v. Culross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Budnik v. Culross, 104 A.D.2d 988, 481 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent City Manager of the City of Rye dated June 28,1983, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain charges of misconduct and dismissed him from his position as a police sergeant.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The record of the hearing held pursuant to section 75 of the Civil Service Law contains substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioner committed various acts of misconduct (see Matter of Lucheso v Dillon, 80 AD2d 988). The penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the misconduct as to shock the conscience of the court (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gibbons and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent City Manager of the City of Rye dated June 28,1983, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain charges of misconduct and dismissed him from his position as a police sergeant.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The record of the hearing held pursuant to section 75 of the Civil Service Law contains substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioner committed various acts of misconduct (see Matter of Lucheso v Dillon, 80 AD2d 988). The penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the misconduct as to shock the conscience of the court (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gibbons and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 988, 481 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budnik-v-culross-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack