Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

101 So. 3d 938, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20891, 2012 WL 6027807
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 2012
DocketNo. 4D10-4064
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 3d 938 (Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 101 So. 3d 938, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20891, 2012 WL 6027807 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

POLEN, J.

We affirm the final judgment because we find that the appellant’s general objec[939]*939tion to bifurcation was not sufficient to preserve the perceived error that certain evidence should be allowed into evidence during Phase I of the proceedings. See Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982); Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla.1992).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, J., and BONAVITA, AUGUST, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinhorst v. State
412 So. 2d 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Rodriguez v. State
609 So. 2d 493 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Corona v. State
64 So. 3d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Noel ex rel. Noel v. Broward General Medical Center
725 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 3d 938, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20891, 2012 WL 6027807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budnick-v-rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-fladistctapp-2012.