Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc.

489 F. App'x 709
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 26, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1618
StatusPublished

This text of 489 F. App'x 709 (Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc., 489 F. App'x 709 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas P. Budnick appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2012). We grant Budnick’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F. App'x 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budnick-v-premier-exhibitions-inc-ca4-2012.