Budnick v. Finkel
133 A. 920, 4 N.J. Misc. 401, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 235
This text of 133 A. 920 (Budnick v. Finkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Budnick v. Finkel, 133 A. 920, 4 N.J. Misc. 401, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 235 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
Defendant has this rule to show cause why the verdicts secured by plaintiffs should not be set aside. As no brief has been filed with us by counsel for the defendant, it is probable that the prosecution of such rule has been abandoned. We have, however, examined the proofs, and conclude that the verdicts should not be disturbed.
The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 A. 920, 4 N.J. Misc. 401, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budnick-v-finkel-nj-1926.