Budke v. St. Francis Medical Center & Alternative Insurance Management Services

777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 48, 2010 WL 376273
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 27, 2010·No. A09-1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 14, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Budke v. St. Francis Medical Center & Alternative Insurance Management Services, 777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 48, 2010 WL 376273 (Mich. 2010).

777 N.W.2d 238 (Budke v. St. Francis Medical Center & Alternative Insurance Management Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)