Budke v. St. Francis Medical Center & Alternative Insurance Management Services

777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 48, 2010 WL 376273
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 27, 2010
DocketA09-1994
StatusPublished

This text of 777 N.W.2d 238 (Budke v. St. Francis Medical Center & Alternative Insurance Management Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Budke v. St. Francis Medical Center & Alternative Insurance Management Services, 777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 48, 2010 WL 376273 (Mich. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 14, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 48, 2010 WL 376273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budke-v-st-francis-medical-center-alternative-insurance-management-minn-2010.