Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Braclet

904 So. 2d 639, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9747, 2005 WL 1467807
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 2005·No. No. 1D04-5087·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for rehearing and for new trial in this civil action, and remand for a jury trial on the issue of damages only. See, e.g., Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So.2d 443 (Fla.1990); Barth v. Fla. State Constructors Serv., Inc., 327 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Baron Auctioneer, Inc. v. Ball, 674 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Barge v. Simeton, 460 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). See also Bruce J. Berman, Florida Civil Procedure ¶¶ 430.4, 430.5[3], at 512-14 (2005 ed.).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Braclet, 904 So. 2d 639, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9747, 2005 WL 1467807 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

904 So. 2d 639 (Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Braclet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curbelo v. Ullman
571 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Baron Auctioneer, Inc. v. Ball
674 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Barth v. Florida State Constructors Service, Inc.
327 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Barge v. Simeton
460 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)