Buddy Casteel and Jaret B. Casteel v. Amelia Stayton and Ray Baugh
This text of Buddy Casteel and Jaret B. Casteel v. Amelia Stayton and Ray Baugh (Buddy Casteel and Jaret B. Casteel v. Amelia Stayton and Ray Baugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 04-14-00820-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/20/2015 11:53:49 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
NO. 04-14-00820-CV
FILED IN IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 02/20/2015 11:53:49 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk BUDDY CASTEEL AND JARET B. CASTEEL
V.
AMELIA STAYTON AND MELISSA RAY BAUGH
APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellants, BUDDY CASTEEL AND JARET B. CASTEEL, respectfully
present their Second Motion for Extension of Time to file their Opening Brief
under TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d), and would respectfully show the Court as follows:
I.
This is an accelerated appeal. Appellants’ Brief was due on February 19,
2015 and this Court stated it would not grant leave to file the brief beyond that
time barring exigent circumstances.
II.
On February 18, 2015, the undersigned’s son for whom he has full custody
broke his elbow from being hit by a baseball at school. The undersigned then was out of the office on February 19, 2015 attending to his son first at an urgent care
clinic and then at an orthopedist. This was a totally unforeseen circumstance that
delayed completion of the brief that day.
III.
In light of this unforeseen circumstance, Appellants ask this Court to extend
the time to file Appellants’ Opening Brief for one day up to and including
February 20, 2015.
IV.
This motion is not brought for purposes of delay but solely that justice may
be served.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants BUDDY
CASTEEL AND JARET B. CASTEEL ask the Court to extend the time to file
their opening brief one day until February 20, 2015. Appellants pray for such
other relief to which they may be entitled consistent with this Court’s decision.
2 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Christopher J. Deeves CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES State Bar No. 00790575
THE LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DEEVES, P.C. 1370 Pantheon Way, Suite 110 San Antonio, Texas 78232 (210) 445-8807 (210) 501-0915 (fax) e-mail: chrisdeeves@att.net
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS BUDDY CASTEEL AND JARET B. CASTEEL
3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
The undersigned hereby certifies that he conferred with opposing counsel for Appellees on February 19, 2015 and this motion is not opposed. .
/s/ Christopher J. Deeves CHRISTOPHER J. DEEVES
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This will certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served as indicated to the following counsel of record listed below on February 20, 2015:
Bobby Jack Rushing The Rushing Law Firm, PLLC 808 London St. Castroville, TX 78009
Via Facsimile or Electronic Service: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES AMELIA STAYTON AND MELISSA RAY BAUGH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Buddy Casteel and Jaret B. Casteel v. Amelia Stayton and Ray Baugh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buddy-casteel-and-jaret-b-casteel-v-amelia-stayton-and-ray-baugh-texapp-2015.