Budd v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Budd v. Hill

248 A.D. 590

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order of peremptory mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the petition dismissed, -without costs. The appeal, in so far as it purports to bring up for review the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict and the motion for a new trial, is dismissed. There is no such order in the record. We are of opinion that the verdict, which in effect determined that the petitioner occupied a permanent position as investigator in the office of the district attorney, has no support in the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of peremptory mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the petition dismissed, -without costs. The appeal, in so far as it purports to bring up for review the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict and the motion for a new trial, is dismissed. There is no such order in the record. We are of opinion that the verdict, which in effect determined that the petitioner occupied a permanent position as investigator in the office of the district attorney, has no support in the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Budd v. Hill, 248 A.D. 590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 590 (Budd v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.