Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Budd v. Camden Horse Railroad

Budd v. Camden Horse Railroad

52 A. 1130, 63 N.J. Eq. 804, 18 Dickinson 804, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 188
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 23, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 52 A. 1130 (Budd v. Camden Horse Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Budd v. Camden Horse Railroad, 52 A. 1130, 63 N.J. Eq. 804, 18 Dickinson 804, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 188 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Grey in the opinion filed in the court below. See 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 543.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A. 1130, 63 N.J. Eq. 804, 18 Dickinson 804, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budd-v-camden-horse-railroad-nj-1902.