Buckwalter v. Borough of Phoenixville
955 A.2d 1014, 598 Pa. 210, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1437
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 3, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 85 MAL 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 955 A.2d 1014 (Buckwalter v. Borough of Phoenixville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Buckwalter v. Borough of Phoenixville, 955 A.2d 1014, 598 Pa. 210, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1437 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Whether Baldwin v. City of Philadelphia, 99 Pa. 164, 1881 WL 13869 (1881), which held Pa. Const, art. III, § 13, now § 27, did not apply to a municipal ordinance that changed a public officer’s compensation mid-term, should be reversed.
(2) Whether Pa. Const, art. III, § 27 prohibits mid-term compensation changes for elected municipal officers by means of a municipal ordinance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Department of Health v. Data-Quest, Inc.
972 A.2d 74 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
955 A.2d 1014, 598 Pa. 210, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckwalter-v-borough-of-phoenixville-pa-2008.