Bucktrot v. Partridge

1928 OK 208, 265 P. 772, 130 Okla. 126, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bucktrot v. Partridge. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Okla. 122
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 27, 1928·No. 18544·Published

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

When Stella Partridge, defendant in error in cause No. 18543, 130 Okla. 122, 265 Pac. 768, received the injuries of which she complains in that action her father, Sam Partridge, was in the automobile with her and Conzey Buck-trot, who was plaintiff in error in that cause. He also received personal injuries for which he filed suit in the district court of Creek county, praying damages for such personal injuries.

For the purpose of trial the two cases were consolidated and tried at the same time and by the same jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff, Sam Partridge, in the sum of $559, to reverse which appeal is prosecuted and the cause submitted on the same briefs as filed in No. 18543, and for a statement of the facts and the law applicable thereto, reference is hereby made to said cause No. 18543, and upon the authorities cited, and for the reasons therein given, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is also affirmed.

BRANSON, G. J., MASON, Y. C. J., and HARRISON, LESTER, CLARK, and HEFNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bucktrot v. Partridge, 1928 OK 208, 265 P. 772, 130 Okla. 126, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 472 (Okla. 1928).

1928 OK 208 (Bucktrot v. Partridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bucktrot v. Partridge
1928 OK 209 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)