Home/Supreme Court/Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley

Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley

308 U.S. 508, 60 S. Ct. 97
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley. Read the opinion of the Court — 308 U.S. 358 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 1939·No. No. 201·Published

Opinion

The appe'al is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1025 (43 Stat. [509]*509936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ' of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.

Mr. Terrell Marshall for petitioner. Mr. W. L. Pope for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley, 308 U.S. 508, 60 S. Ct. 97 (1939).

308 U.S. 508 (Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.