Bucksport Nat. Bank v. Conners

216 F. 990, 132 C.C.A. 90, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1400
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1914
DocketNo. 1072
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 F. 990 (Bucksport Nat. Bank v. Conners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bucksport Nat. Bank v. Conners, 216 F. 990, 132 C.C.A. 90, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1400 (1st Cir. 1914).

Opinion

PER OURIAM.

The facts in this case are fully stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the District Court, and the law carefully applied therein to those facts. It is not necessary for us to reiterate what is there stated. We all thinl? that the findings of the learned judge therein, and the reasoning •upon which his conclusions are based, are correct. The decree of the District Court is affirmed, with costs for the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watchmaker v. Barnes
259 F. 783 (First Circuit, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F. 990, 132 C.C.A. 90, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucksport-nat-bank-v-conners-ca1-1914.