Buckner v. Walker

Fourth Circuit

Buckner v. Walker

461 F. App'x 201

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2011·No. No. 11-6409·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Buckner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. Walker, No. 8:10-cv-03416-DKC (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2011; March 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Buckner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. Walker, No. 8:10-cv-03416-DKC (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2011; March 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Buckner v. Walker, 461 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

461 F. App'x 201 (Buckner v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.