Buckner v. Veuve

63 Cal. 304, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 438
California Supreme Court·Decided April 6, 1883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Quo warranta lies to prevent the usurpation of an office. Prohibition is not available as a remedy for that purpose.

Application for a writ of prohibition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckner v. Veuve, 63 Cal. 304, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 438 (Cal. 1883).

63 Cal. 304 (Buckner v. Veuve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nielsen v. Gregory
213 P. 510 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
People v. Toal
24 P. 603 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Walcott v. Wells
24 P. 867 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1890)