Home/California Supreme Court/Buckner v. Veuve

Buckner v. Veuve

63 Cal. 304, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 438
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 6, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 Cal. 304 (Buckner v. Veuve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckner v. Veuve, 63 Cal. 304, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 438 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—

Quo warranta lies to prevent the usurpation of an office. Prohibition is not available as a remedy for that purpose.

Application for a writ of prohibition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nielsen v. Gregory
213 P. 510 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
People v. Toal
24 P. 603 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Walcott v. Wells
24 P. 867 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Cal. 304, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckner-v-veuve-cal-1883.