Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

690 F. App'x 842
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 641 F. App'x 262
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 30, 2017·No. 17-1127·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Union Carbide Corp. v. Richards, 721 F.3d 307, 314-15 (4th Cir. 2013); Foy v. Giant Food Inc., 298 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv., No. 5:16-cv-00644-D, 2016 WL 6477048 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 690 F. App'x 842 (4th Cir. 2017).

690 F. App'x 842 (Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Union Carbide Corporation v. Virginia Richards
721 F.3d 307 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
Foy v. Giant Food Inc.
298 F.3d 284 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)