Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
This text of 690 F. App'x 842 (Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Union Carbide Corp. v. Richards, 721 F.3d 307, 314-15 (4th Cir. 2013); Foy v. Giant Food Inc., 298 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv., No. 5:16-cv-00644-D, 2016 WL 6477048 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 F. App'x 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckner-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca4-2017.