Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

489 F. App'x 709

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 26, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1733

StatusPublished

This text of 489 F. App'x 709 (Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 489 F. App'x 709 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the magistrate judge’s and the district [710]*710court’s various pretrial orders and the district court’s final order denying relief on Buckner’s complaint alleging violations of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act (“NCWHA”), the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and additional federal and state administrative code sections. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00411-BR (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2010; Jan. 27, 2011; Mar. 24, 2011; July 19, 2011; Dec. 22, 2011; Feb. 28, 2012; Apr. 4, 2012; May 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the magistrate judge’s and the district [710]*710court’s various pretrial orders and the district court’s final order denying relief on Buckner’s complaint alleging violations of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act (“NCWHA”), the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and additional federal and state administrative code sections. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00411-BR (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2010; Jan. 27, 2011; Mar. 24, 2011; July 19, 2011; Dec. 22, 2011; Feb. 28, 2012; Apr. 4, 2012; May 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 F. App'x 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckner-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca4-2012.