Buckner v. Harper

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2003
Docket02-7825
StatusUnpublished

This text of Buckner v. Harper (Buckner v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckner v. Harper, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7825

MAURICE D. BUCKNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH K. HARPER, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Louisa County; HENRY A. KENNON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Louisa County, Virginia; LOUISA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, individually and in his/her official capacity as Administrator of Louisa County, Virginia; DIRECTOR, Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex, individually and in his/her official capacity as Director; ALBEMARLE- CHARLOTTESVILLE JOINT SECURITY COMPLEX; MARGARET MCLEOD CAIN, individually and as plaintiff’s former attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1029-7)

Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003

Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice D. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Maurice D. Buckner appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint

for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buckner

v. Harper, No. CA-02-1029-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Buckner v. Harper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckner-v-harper-ca4-2003.