Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift

Fourth Circuit

Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift

604 F. App'x 310

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2015·No. No. 15-6162·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Dwayne Buckner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift, (That worked on 5/01/12), No. 8:14-cv-00789-RWT (D.Md. filed Jan. 16, 2015 & entered Jan. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Dwayne Buckner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift, (That worked on 5/01/12), No. 8:14-cv-00789-RWT (D.Md. filed Jan. 16, 2015 & entered Jan. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift, 604 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

604 F. App'x 310 (Buckner v. E.P.R.U.C. Shift) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related