Buckmaster v. Monighan Machine Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Buckmaster v. Monighan Machine Co.

202 Ill. App. 156

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedNovember 27, 1916

DocketGen. No. 22,447

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 156 (Buckmaster v. Monighan Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckmaster v. Monighan Machine Co., 202 Ill. App. 156 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Brokers, § 90*—when evidence does not justify verdict for commissions. In an action to recover commissions for the sale of a machine by the defendant, alleged to have been made on information given him by the plaintiff, evidence held not to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. 2. Costs, § 76*—what judgment for costs entered against plaintiff on reversal and nil capiat. Where on the evidence the finding of the trial court should have been for the defendant, a judgment for the plaintiff was reversed and a judgment of nil capiat and for costs to be taxed against the plaintiff, both in the trial court and in the Appellate Court, was entered in the Appellate Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Brokers, § 90*—when evidence does not justify verdict for commissions. In an action to recover commissions for the sale of a machine by the defendant, alleged to have been made on information given him by the plaintiff, evidence held not to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. 2. Costs, § 76*—what judgment for costs entered against plaintiff on reversal and nil capiat. Where on the evidence the finding of the trial court should have been for the defendant, a judgment for the plaintiff was reversed and a judgment of nil capiat and for costs to be taxed against the plaintiff, both in the trial court and in the Appellate Court, was entered in the Appellate Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckmaster-v-monighan-machine-co-illappct-1916.