Buckman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

154 N.Y.S. 1113, 169 A.D. 938, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9184

This text of 154 N.Y.S. 1113 (Buckman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 154 N.Y.S. 1113, 169 A.D. 938, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Action by Meta Buckman against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company and others. A. H. Cole, of New York City, for appellants. J. W. Bermant, of New York City, for respondent. No opinion. [1114]*1114Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment of costs of action to date to be taxed. Order filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 N.Y.S. 1113, 169 A.D. 938, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckman-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappdiv-1915.