Bucklin v. United States

159 U.S. 680, 16 S. Ct. 182, 40 L. Ed. 304, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2337
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 18, 1895
Docket1; 246
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 159 U.S. 680 (Bucklin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bucklin v. United States, 159 U.S. 680, 16 S. Ct. 182, 40 L. Ed. 304, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2337 (1895).

Opinion

Me. Justice Hablan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant BucMin was convicted of the crime of perjury-under section 5392 of the Kevised Statutes, and sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor in the penitentiary for thé term of one and one-half years, and also to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. He seeks a review of that judgment by the present appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed. By section five of the act .of March 3,1891, c. 517,26 Stat. 826, “ appeals or writs of error may be taken from the District Courts or from the .existing Circuit Courts” of the United States directly to this court, in certain enumerated cases, civil and criminal, among others, “in cases of conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime.” There was no purpose by that act to abolish the general distinction, at common law, between an appeal and a writ of error. The final judgment of a court of the United States in a case of the conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime is not reviewable here except upon writ of error. Our review of the judgment, when brought here in that form, is confined to questions of law, properly presented by a bill of exceptions, or arising upon the record.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher Ex Rel. Barcelon v. Baker
203 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 2010)
United States v. Kovich
66 F. Supp. 579 (D. Alaska, 1946)
United States v. Brown
116 F.2d 455 (Seventh Circuit, 1940)
Pesquera v. United States
9 F.2d 758 (First Circuit, 1926)
Grant v. United States
227 U.S. 74 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Pierce v. United States
37 D.C. App. 582 (D.C. Circuit, 1911)
Sena v. United States
147 F. 485 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
Krause v. United States
147 F. 442 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
Sprinkle v. United States
141 F. 811 (Fourth Circuit, 1905)
Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.
194 U.S. 324 (Supreme Court, 1904)
De Lemos v. United States
107 F. 121 (Fifth Circuit, 1901)
Rice v. Ames
180 U.S. 371 (Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 U.S. 680, 16 S. Ct. 182, 40 L. Ed. 304, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucklin-v-united-states-scotus-1895.