Buckley v. US Government

Fourth Circuit

Buckley v. US Government

160 F. App'x 294

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 2005

DocketNo. 05-7501

StatusPublished

This text of 160 F. App'x 294 (Buckley v. US Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckley v. US Government, 160 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Buckley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his action filed under the Federal Torts Claim Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buckley v. United States, No. CA-04-21900-TLW-4 (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Buckley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his action filed under the Federal Torts Claim Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buckley v. United States, No. CA-04-21900-TLW-4 (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 F. App'x 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-us-government-ca4-2005.