Buckley v. Sutton

38 Mich. 1, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 1
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 38 Mich. 1 (Buckley v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckley v. Sutton, 38 Mich. 1, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 1 (Mich. 1878).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A writ of error must be sued out within two years after judgment, and a party cannot prolong the time by moving to vacate the judgment, although considerable delay is made before the motion is decided. To hold otherwise would be to 'defeat the statute and enable any one to gain time by sham proceedings. The terms of the statute are obligatory on the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mountain States Implement Co. v. Arave
2 P.2d 314 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1931)
Kline v. Murray
257 P. 465 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Potaschnik v. Kaimola
185 N.W. 824 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
Bliss v. Caille Bros.
122 N.W. 543 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Hill v. Hill
72 N.W. 597 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Busch v. Wilcox
64 N.W. 485 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Mich. 1, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-sutton-mich-1878.