Buckley v. Robertson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Buckley v. Robertson

186 Ill. App. 603

DecidedMay 1, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 186 Ill. App. 603 (Buckley v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckley v. Robertson, 186 Ill. App. 603 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Trial, § 93*—necessity of specific objection to evidence. Objections on a trial to a paper or other evidence must be specifically pointed out so that it may be obviated if possible. 4. Bills and notes, § 479*—when party cannot complain of want of proof of ownership of note. Where defendant in an action on a note objected to plaintiff’s proof of his ownership of the note and the objection was sustained, he cannot complain of want of such proof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Trial, § 93*—necessity of specific objection to evidence. Objections on a trial to a paper or other evidence must be specifically pointed out so that it may be obviated if possible. 4. Bills and notes, § 479*—when party cannot complain of want of proof of ownership of note. Where defendant in an action on a note objected to plaintiff’s proof of his ownership of the note and the objection was sustained, he cannot complain of want of such proof.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 Ill. App. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-robertson-illappct-1914.