Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto

395 U.S. 163, 89 S. Ct. 1647, 23 L. Ed. 2d 174, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1610
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 19, 1969
Docket1209
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 395 U.S. 163 (Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto, 395 U.S. 163, 89 S. Ct. 1647, 23 L. Ed. 2d 174, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1610 (1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Lawrence
740 F.2d 1362 (Third Circuit, 1984)
Baugh v. Carver
444 N.E.2d 58 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1981)
State, Ex Rel., Keener v. Serr
372 N.E.2d 360 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1976)
National Used Cars, Inc. v. City of Kalamazoo
233 N.W.2d 64 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
P & S Investment Co. v. Brown
320 N.E.2d 675 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 U.S. 163, 89 S. Ct. 1647, 23 L. Ed. 2d 174, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-ohio-by-barbuto-scotus-1969.