Buckley v. Lyttle
10 Johns. 117
Opinion
The case of Van Brynen and others v. Wilson (9 East, 321.) is in point, to show that the court will not interfere, in such a case, in this way. In that case, the plaintiffs, after verdict, became alien enemies, and the court of K. B. refused to stay the judgment and execution, on motion. They said “ that if the defendant had any remedy, by law, he might avail himself of it, if so advised, but that they would not interfere in the manner proposed, on such an occasion.” The motion must be denied.
Motion denied,
See Clarke v. Morey, ante, 69.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buckley v. Lyttle, 10 Johns. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).
10 Johns. 117 (Buckley v. Lyttle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kershaw v. Kelsey
100 Mass. 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Patterson v. Thompson
24 Ark. 55 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1862)
Stevenson v. Belknap
6 Iowa 97 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)