Buckley v. Lyttle

New York Supreme Court

Buckley v. Lyttle

10 Johns. 117

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1813

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 Johns. 117 (Buckley v. Lyttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckley v. Lyttle, 10 Johns. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case of Van Brynen and others v. Wilson (9 East, 321.) is in point, to show that the court will not interfere, in such a case, in this way. In that case, the plaintiffs, after verdict, became alien enemies, and the court of K. B. refused to stay the judgment and execution, on motion. They said “ that if the defendant had any remedy, by law, he might avail himself of it, if so advised, but that they would not interfere in the manner proposed, on such an occasion.” The motion must be denied.

Motion denied,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The case of Van Brynen and others v. Wilson (9 East, 321.) is in point, to show that the court will not interfere, in such a case, in this way. In that case, the plaintiffs, after verdict, became alien enemies, and the court of K. B. refused to stay the judgment and execution, on motion. They said “ that if the defendant had any remedy, by law, he might avail himself of it, if so advised, but that they would not interfere in the manner proposed, on such an occasion.” The motion must be denied.

Motion denied,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Johns. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-lyttle-nysupct-1813.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack