Buckley v. Litman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buckley v. Litman

87 A.D.2d 738, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16087

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 738 (Buckley v. Litman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckley v. Litman, 87 A.D.2d 738, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Did Special Term err as a matter of law in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment?” Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Did Special Term err as a matter of law in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment?” Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 738, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-litman-nyappdiv-1982.