Buckley v. Eaton

60 Ill. 252
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

In these eases there is no assignment of errors found upon the record, as required by the rule of court, nor do we find any accompanying the record; and the rule in reference to abstracts has been disregarded. Appellant, in each case, has failed to prepare and file an abstract of the record; but there has been filed in each case a printed index to the transcript. We must presume the attorney was aware of the rules of the court, and has intentionally disregarded them.

As the cases have not been prepared as required by the rule, we decline to consider them, and affirm the judgments.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckley v. Eaton, 60 Ill. 252 (Ill. 1871).

60 Ill. 252 (Buckley v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biggs v. Spader
103 N.E.2d 104 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1951)
Gyure v. Sloan Valve Co.
11 N.E.2d 963 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1937)
Seubert v. Fawick Tractor Co.
154 N.W. 446 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly
122 N.W. 646 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1909)
Ditch v. Sennott
116 Ill. 288 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1886)
Spencer v. McMaster
3 P. 798 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1884)
Halleck v. Bresnahen
2 P. 537 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1883)
Town of Santa Anna v. Tipton
10 Ill. App. 310 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1882)