Buckley v. Costello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buckley v. Costello

31 A.D.2d 540, 295 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2935

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 540 (Buckley v. Costello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckley v. Costello, 31 A.D.2d 540, 295 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 7, 1967, which denied appellants’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion (1) granted on condition appellant Ferdine Gaston submit to a pretrial physical examination and appellants submit to oral pretrial examinations, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, if respondents shall demand such examinations upon 10 days’ written notice; and (2) denied in the event appellants default in submitting to such examinations after such demand. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that appellants be allowed to amend their bill of particulars to include additional claimed injuries and expenses upon the condition stated. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 7, 1967, which denied appellants’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion (1) granted on condition appellant Ferdine Gaston submit to a pretrial physical examination and appellants submit to oral pretrial examinations, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, if respondents shall demand such examinations upon 10 days’ written notice; and (2) denied in the event appellants default in submitting to such examinations after such demand. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that appellants be allowed to amend their bill of particulars to include additional claimed injuries and expenses upon the condition stated. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 540, 295 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-costello-nyappdiv-1968.