Buckley v. Conley

47 P. 735, 16 Wash. 338, 1897 Wash. LEXIS 315
Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 21, 1897·No. No. 2385·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause was submitted on the briefs of counsel. Respondents’ brief contains a motion to dismiss the appeal because no final judgment had been entered herein. The record transmitted to this court does not contain either the verdict or the judgment. Hence it does not appeal that any judg[339]*339ment has been entered from which an appeal would lie. The motion must prevail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckley v. Conley, 47 P. 735, 16 Wash. 338, 1897 Wash. LEXIS 315 (Wash. 1897).

47 P. 735 (Buckley v. Conley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raymond v. King County
201 P. 455 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
Dossett v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.
69 P. 9 (Washington Supreme Court, 1902)