Buckley v. Collyer
This text of 147 N.Y.S. 1101 (Buckley v. Collyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plainti~'s testimony is so contradicted by the documentary evidence, and the amount of the award seems so excessive, that it appears quite evident that the jury's verdict is not founded upon a proper consideration of the evidence, but is based on mistake or bias. Judgment is therefore reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
LEHMAN and WHITAKER, JJ., concur. PAGE, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 N.Y.S. 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-collyer-nyappdiv-1914.