Buckley v. Buckley

124 A. 608, 95 N.J. Eq. 783, 10 Stock. 783, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 909
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 4, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-TURN, KATZENBAOH, CAMPBELL, WHITE-6. For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, Black, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark—6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckley v. Buckley, 124 A. 608, 95 N.J. Eq. 783, 10 Stock. 783, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 909 (N.J. 1924).

124 A. 608 (Buckley v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
168 A.2d 851 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Amond v. Amond
35 A.2d 679 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)