Buckley v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buckley v. Board of Elections

265 A.D.2d 866, 705 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9960

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 866 (Buckley v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckley v. Board of Elections, 265 A.D.2d 866, 705 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition [867]*867dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent Mark Walker appeals from an order directing respondent George W. Gauer, Sr. to notice and reconvene the Town of Springwater Republican Party Caucus for the purpose of determining the party’s nominee for the office of Town Supervisor and directing respondent Board of Elections of Livingston County to strike Walker’s name from the certificate of nominations. Supreme Court erred in determining that all necessary parties were named in the proceeding. Gauer’s authority as acting chairperson of the caucus ceased on August 13, 1999 when that caucus was closed. The chairperson of the Town Republican party is the “proper party authoritty]” to reconvene the caucus and therefore should have been joined as a necessary party (Election Law § 6-108 [3]; see, Davis v Piggott, 144 Misc 2d 420, 423, affd 153 AD2d 718). The failure to join all necessary parties “within the time required by Election Law § 16-102 (2) was a defect that could not be cured by amendment pursuant to CPLR 1003 after the expiration of the limitation period” (Matter of Marin v Board of Elections, 67 NY2d 634, 636-637). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, VanStrydonck, J. — Election Law.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ. (Filed Sept. 15, 1999.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition [867]*867dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent Mark Walker appeals from an order directing respondent George W. Gauer, Sr. to notice and reconvene the Town of Springwater Republican Party Caucus for the purpose of determining the party’s nominee for the office of Town Supervisor and directing respondent Board of Elections of Livingston County to strike Walker’s name from the certificate of nominations. Supreme Court erred in determining that all necessary parties were named in the proceeding. Gauer’s authority as acting chairperson of the caucus ceased on August 13, 1999 when that caucus was closed. The chairperson of the Town Republican party is the “proper party authoritty]” to reconvene the caucus and therefore should have been joined as a necessary party (Election Law § 6-108 [3]; see, Davis v Piggott, 144 Misc 2d 420, 423, affd 153 AD2d 718). The failure to join all necessary parties “within the time required by Election Law § 16-102 (2) was a defect that could not be cured by amendment pursuant to CPLR 1003 after the expiration of the limitation period” (Matter of Marin v Board of Elections, 67 NY2d 634, 636-637). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, VanStrydonck, J. — Election Law.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ. (Filed Sept. 15, 1999.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 866, 705 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack