Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald

356 So. 2d 1306, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15612
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 1978
DocketNo. 77-910
StatusPublished

This text of 356 So. 2d 1306 (Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald, 356 So. 2d 1306, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15612 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc., appeals a final order dismissing its action for declaratory decree and other relief before the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida. The plaintiff sought to enforce its right of first refusal upon the sale of the defendant Herbert Buchwald’s interest as lessor on a ninety-nine year recreational lease with the plaintiff pursuant to Section 711.63(7)(b), (c), Florida Statutes (1975).1 The lease itself permits the lessor defendant Herbert Buchwald to freely assign and encumber his interest under the lease; there is no provision in the lease giving the plaintiff the right of first refusal upon a sale of the lessor’s leasehold interest. The defendants Arlene Buchwald and Joseph Walan were joined as party defendants because they allegedly participated with the defendant Herbert Buchwald in the sale of the leasehold interest herein without first giving the plaintiff a right of first refusal on the sale.

Based on well-settled principles of statutory construction and constitutional law, we hold that Section 711.63(7)(b), (c), Florida Statutes (1975) is inapplicable to the lease herein because the said lease was entered into prior to the effective date of the statute and said statute cannot be retroactively applied to alter or vary the terms of such a lease. Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. Halligan, 344 So.2d 239, 241 (Fla.1977); Avila South Condominium Ass’n. v. Kappa Corp., 347 So.2d 599 (Fla.1976); Fleeman v. Case, 342 So.2d 815 (Fla.1976); Point East One Condominium Corp. v. Point East Developers, Inc., 348 So.2d 32 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Plaza del Prado Condominium Ass’n. v. Del Prado Management Co., 298 So.2d 544 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). Accordingly, the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint herein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. Halligan
344 So. 2d 239 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Fleeman v. Case
342 So. 2d 815 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Avila South Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Kappa Corp.
347 So. 2d 599 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Plaza Prado Condo. Ass'n v. Del Prado Mgmt.
298 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Point East One Condominium v. POINT EAST, ETC.
348 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 So. 2d 1306, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-towers-condominium-inc-v-buchwald-fladistctapp-1978.