Buckley Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Goldman
This text of 16 A.D.2d 873 (Buckley Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term denying plaintiffs’ motion to strike out answer [874]*874of defendant Abe Goldman and for partial summary judgment under rules 113 and 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice against defendant Abe Goldman.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 873, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-petroleum-products-inc-v-goldman-nyappdiv-1962.