Buckley Construction Corp. v. Hungerford

8 A.D.2d 757, 187 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8742

This text of 8 A.D.2d 757 (Buckley Construction Corp. v. Hungerford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckley Construction Corp. v. Hungerford, 8 A.D.2d 757, 187 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Onondaga Special Term directing that the two actions be tried together without consolidation, that the venue be fixed in Onondaga County, and that plaintiff-defendant Hunger-ford be given the right to open and close.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Halpern, JJ. [16 Misc 2d 299.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckley Construction Corp. v. Hungerford
16 Misc. 2d 299 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 757, 187 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckley-construction-corp-v-hungerford-nyappdiv-1959.