Buckles v. Buckles
81 Ind. 159
Opinion
Appellant sued for a divorce; the appellee filed a cross bill and the divorce was granted to him.
The appellant clafms that the alimony allowed her is insufficient. The amount to be allowed as alimony is very much within the discretion of the trial court, and this court will interfere only in cases where the discretion has been abused. Powell v. Powell, 53 Ind. 513; Conn v. Conn, 57 Ind. 323. We have looked into the evidence, and are satisfied that there, was no abuse of the discretionary powers vested in the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buckles v. Buckles, 81 Ind. 159 (Ind. 1881).
81 Ind. 159 (Buckles v. Buckles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bitner v. Bitner
91 N.E.2d 169 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1950)
Sellers v. Sellers
40 N.E. 699 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Henderson v. Henderson
11 N.E. 432 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
Logan v. Logan
90 Ind. 107 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)