Buckle v. Buhre Avenue Foods Inc.
This text of 232 A.D.2d 269 (Buckle v. Buhre Avenue Foods Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered July 13, 1995, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
[270]*270In an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained when plaintiff delivered milk to defendants’ supermarket, defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. It was not plaintiffs’ burden in opposing the motion to demonstrate the negligence of defendants or the proximate cause of the accident; rather, it was defendants’ burden, as movants,, to establish the absence of creation of the dangerous condition or notice thereof as a matter of law, where plaintiff submitted proof that he was struck in the head and neck by boxes of canned goods while making a delivery on defendants’ premises and without having had any prior contact with the boxes (Colt v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 209 AD2d 294). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Ross and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D.2d 269, 648 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckle-v-buhre-avenue-foods-inc-nyappdiv-1996.