Buckins v. State
93 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2327806, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9940
Opinion
Affirmed. See State v. Gutierrez, 10 So.3d 158, 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (where sentence is a result of a plea agreement for a specific sentence, the trial court does not have authority to circumvent that through a motion to mitigate); Right v. State, 784 So.2d 396, 401 (Fla.2001) (court rejects claims of disparate sentencing where co-defendant’s lesser sentence was a result of plea agreement or prosecutorial discretion).
WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buckins v. State, 93 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2327806, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9940 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
93 So. 3d 1072 (Buckins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Gutierrez
10 So. 3d 158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Kight v. State
784 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)