Buckins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buckins v. State

93 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2327806, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9940

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 20, 2012

DocketNo. 4D10-5196

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 1072 (Buckins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckins v. State, 93 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2327806, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9940 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Gutierrez, 10 So.3d 158, 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (where sentence is a result of a plea agreement for a specific sentence, the trial court does not have authority to circumvent that through a motion to mitigate); Right v. State, 784 So.2d 396, 401 (Fla.2001) (court rejects claims of disparate sentencing where co-defendant’s lesser sentence was a result of plea agreement or prosecutorial discretion).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Gutierrez, 10 So.3d 158, 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (where sentence is a result of a plea agreement for a specific sentence, the trial court does not have authority to circumvent that through a motion to mitigate); Right v. State, 784 So.2d 396, 401 (Fla.2001) (court rejects claims of disparate sentencing where co-defendant’s lesser sentence was a result of plea agreement or prosecutorial discretion).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2327806, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckins-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack