Buckingham v. Springfield Building & Loan Ass'n

1 Ohio Law Rep. 611
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 1903·Published

Opinion

As stated in the principal case, counsel for the parties in these eases were heard orally in the argument of The State National Bank v. Esterly, Receiver, just decided, and their briefs have been read and considered with the briefs in that case.

What we have said in Bank v. Esterly, Receiver, can well be applied to these cases, and further discussion of them is unnecessary.

[614]*614The judgment of the circuit court in each case is reversed, and judgment is rendered in each ease for plaintiff in error.

Judgments reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckingham v. Springfield Building & Loan Ass'n, 1 Ohio Law Rep. 611 (Ohio 1903).

1 Ohio Law Rep. 611 (Buckingham v. Springfield Building & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.