Buckingham v. Shearer

102 P.2d 47, 55 Wyo. 528, 1940 Wyo. LEXIS 19
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedMay 3, 1940
Docket2148
StatusPublished

This text of 102 P.2d 47 (Buckingham v. Shearer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckingham v. Shearer, 102 P.2d 47, 55 Wyo. 528, 1940 Wyo. LEXIS 19 (Wyo. 1940).

Opinion

Riner, Chief Justice.

This cause has been undertaken to be brought here by the direct appeal method of appellate procedure to review a judgment of the district court of Big Horn County. The record is in this condition: A judgment form for the Clerk’s guidance in entering the judgment rendered in the cause and from which the appeal is endeavored to be taken is dated March 13, 1939; it was filed in the office of the Clerk of the District Court aforesaid on the day following its date, and the judgment was entered in the journal of that court on the date the form above mentioned was filed, i. e., March 14, 1939. The notice of appeal from this judgment is not dated, but discloses that it was served by an acceptance of service on the part of respondent’s counsel on *530 March 30, 1939. The notice itself was filed in the office of the Clerk of the District Court of Big Horn County on April 1, 1939, more than ten days after the judgment attempted to be appealed from was entered.

Respondent has filed her motion to dismiss the appeal, relying upon Hahn v. Citizens’ State Bank et al., 25 Wyo. 467, 171 P. 889, 172 P. 705; Culbertson v. Ainsworth, 26 Wyo. 214, 181 P. 418, 419, and many other decisions rendered by this court during the past two decades. See Spencer v. Loewenstein, 29 Wyo. 31, 207 P. 1098; In re Big Bend Drainage District, 29 Wyo. 50, 208 P. 872, 873; Koch v. Koch, 41 Wyo. 450, 287 P. 85; Lindback v. Lackey et al., 41 Wyo. 493, 287 P. 320; State v. Holmes, 43 Wyo. 66, 296 P. 1077; Simpson v. Occidental Building & Loan Assn., 45 Wyo. 425, 19 P. (2d) 958; Wyoming Automotive Co. v. Weisflog, 47 Wyo. 32, 30 P. (2d) 490; Farmers State Bank of Riverton v. Investors Guaranty Corporation, 48 Wyo. 319, 324, 45 P. (2d) 1057.

On the authority of these decisions the cause must be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Kimball and Blu,me, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simpson v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'n
19 P.2d 958 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1933)
Lindback v. Lackey
287 P. 320 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)
Wyoming Automotive Co. v. Weisflog
30 P.2d 490 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1934)
State v. Holmes
296 P. 1077 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1931)
Koch v. Koch
287 P. 85 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)
Farmers State Bank of Riverton v. Investors Guaranty Corp.
45 P.2d 1057 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1935)
Hahn v. Citizens State Bank
171 P. 889 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1918)
Culbertson v. Ainsworth
181 P. 418 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1919)
Spencer v. Loewenstein
207 P. 1098 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 P.2d 47, 55 Wyo. 528, 1940 Wyo. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckingham-v-shearer-wyo-1940.