Buckingham v. Andrews
34 Barb. 434, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85
This text of 34 Barb. 434 (Buckingham v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Buckingham v. Andrews, 34 Barb. 434, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).
Opinion
The plaintiff was not the representative of a deceased person, according to the laws of this state. He could not sue here in a representative capacity, and can only he regarded as the indorsee of the note.
The court therefore erred in excluding the witness.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.
Clerke, Gould and Ingraham, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Guery v. Kinsler
3 S.C. 423 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1872)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Barb. 434, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckingham-v-andrews-nysupct-1861.