Buckingham Township v. Wykle
This text of 27 F. App'x 87 (Buckingham Township v. Wykle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Buckingham Township appeals the District Court’s entry of summary judgment for the defendant agencies in its suit challenging their approval of an improvement to U.S. Route 202, Section 700 and the development of an interchange at the intersection of Route 202 and State Route 313 (also known as Pools Corner). The District Court wrote an excellent opinion that thoroughly addressed each of the numerous issues raised by Buckingham Township in its lengthy brief. We have nothing to add to that Court’s fine opinion, and thus affirm.
This summary affirmance is not meant to imply that Buckingham Township raised frivolous issues. Indeed, it raised serious questions with respect to the procedures followed by the agencies. For example, they could have done a better job of apprising Buckingham Township of the progress of the Section 700 and Pools Corner projects. Further, they could have been more forthcoming in explaining adjustments to the data generated by their computer models. While we believe that the District Court answered these concerns admirably, nonetheless we encourage the agencies to keep Buckingham Township fully in the loop during upcoming projects (and phases of current projects) affecting Buckingham Township.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 F. App'x 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckingham-township-v-wykle-ca3-2002.