Bucki v. Bucki

New York Supreme Court

Bucki v. Bucki

24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 598, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 287

DecidedJune 30, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 24 N.Y.S. 374 (Bucki v. Bucki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bucki v. Bucki, 24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 598, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 287 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

FEE CURIAM.

The allegations in the complaint, if supported by evidence on the trial, will entitle plaintiff to the judgment prayed for. A situation, therefore, was presented on the motion which authorized the court, in the exercise of a proper judicial discretion, to make an allowance for costs and alimony pending the action. The amount awarded was justified, we think, by the affidavits before the court. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FEE CURIAM.

The allegations in the complaint, if supported by evidence on the trial, will entitle plaintiff to the judgment prayed for. A situation, therefore, was presented on the motion which authorized the court, in the exercise of a proper judicial discretion, to make an allowance for costs and alimony pending the action. The amount awarded was justified, we think, by the affidavits before the court. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 598, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucki-v-bucki-nysupct-1893.