Buckhorn Land & Timber Co. v. Yarborough

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Buckhorn Land & Timber Co. v. Yarborough

106 S.E. 843, 181 N.C. 480, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 113

DecidedMarch 9, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 843 (Buckhorn Land & Timber Co. v. Yarborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buckhorn Land & Timber Co. v. Yarborough, 106 S.E. 843, 181 N.C. 480, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 113 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case was before the Court at Spring Term, 1920, and reported in 179 N. C., 335. The same questions there presented and discussed are raised again on this appeal. "We deem it unnecessary to reiterate what was said on the former hearing.

Upon trial in the Superior Court, the case was made to turn on the character of E. Jane Yarborough’s possession of the locus in quo. Plaintiff contended that she occupied and held the lands as a tenant of plaintiff’s predecessor in title. This was denied by the defendant, and upon issue joined there was a verdict adverse to the plaintiff’s contention.

The ease also involved a question of estoppel and a plea of the statute of limitations; but, after a careful examination of the record and plaintiff’s exceptions, we think the verdict and judgment should stand.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This case was before the Court at Spring Term, 1920, and reported in 179 N. C., 335. The same questions there presented and discussed are raised again on this appeal. "We deem it unnecessary to reiterate what was said on the former hearing.

Upon trial in the Superior Court, the case was made to turn on the character of E. Jane Yarborough’s possession of the locus in quo. Plaintiff contended that she occupied and held the lands as a tenant of plaintiff’s predecessor in title. This was denied by the defendant, and upon issue joined there was a verdict adverse to the plaintiff’s contention.

The ease also involved a question of estoppel and a plea of the statute of limitations; but, after a careful examination of the record and plaintiff’s exceptions, we think the verdict and judgment should stand.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 S.E. 843, 181 N.C. 480, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckhorn-land-timber-co-v-yarborough-nc-1921.