Buckeye Pipeline Co. v. Congel-Hazard, Inc.
This text of 41 A.D.2d 590 (Buckeye Pipeline Co. v. Congel-Hazard, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Same memorandum as in Buckeye Pipeline Co. v. Congel-Hazard (41 A D 2d 590) decided herewith. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term dismissing complaint in action for damages to pipeline.) Present — Goldman, P. J. Harsh, Houle, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.D.2d 590, 340 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckeye-pipeline-co-v-congel-hazard-inc-nyappdiv-1973.