Buckelew v. Grossbard
469 A.2d 518, 192 N.J. Super. 188
Opinion
PATRICIA J. BUCKELEW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL J. GROSSBARD, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges FRITZ and FURMAN.
*189 Zarin & Maran, attorneys for appellant (Joe Maran of counsel and on the brief).
Kohn & Needle, attorneys for respondent (Emanuel Needle on the letter brief).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Simpson in his published opinion at 189 N.J. Super. 584 (Law Div. 1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buckelew v. Grossbard, 469 A.2d 518, 192 N.J. Super. 188 (N.J. Ct. App. 1983).
469 A.2d 518 (Buckelew v. Grossbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glick v. Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc.
692 A.2d 1004 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)