Buckelew v. Gore

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DION SCOTT BUCKELEW, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00158-WQH-JLB

12 ORDER Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WILLIAM D. GORE, et al., 15

16 Defendants. 17 HAYES, Judge: 18 The matters before the Court are the Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss for Lack 19 of Personal Jurisdiction, or alternatively, Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by 20 Defendants (ECF No. 3) and the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate 21 Judge (ECF No. 9). 22 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 23 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 24 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 25 report . . . to which objection is made” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in 26 part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 27 The district court need not review de novo those portions of a Report and Recommendation 28 1 which neither party objects. See Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 n.13 (9th Cir. 2 2005); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (th Cir. 2003) (“Neither the 3 || Constitution nor the [Federal Magistrates Act] requires a district judge to review, de novo, 4 || findings and recommendations that the parties themselves accept as correct.”). 5 The record reflects that no objections have been filed by either party. The Court has 6 || reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record, and the submissions of the parties. 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) is 8 || ADOPTED in its entirety. The Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss for Lack of Personal 9 || Jurisdiction, or alternatively, Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendants (ECF 10 3) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Any 11 motion for leave to file an amended pleading must be filed within 30 days of this Order. 12 |} Dated: September 3, 2020 BME: ie Z. A a 13 Hon. William Q. Hayes 14 United States District Court 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28